Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo

OPINIONS

Tue 01 Oct 2024 10:35 am - Jerusalem Time

US-Israeli Partnership

US-Israeli relations are based on serving common interests and confronting common enemies, through various tools and numerous means: political, diplomatic, media, and others, reaching the most influential and direct tools based on the exchange of intelligence and technology, and militarily, directing preemptive strikes against hostile parties, or practicing declared or undeclared action in response to any hostile attacks targeting them by countries or combat organizations.


The opponent or enemy camp of this alliance, in which the European group often participates in one way or another: Britain, France, Germany, Italy and others, depending on the circumstances and data, is facing:


First: The Russian-Chinese camp, which is working to end the state of monopoly in managing international politics that the United States and its allies have monopolized since the end of the Cold War in 1990, which led to the defeat of the socialist camp and those with it, as Russia is working to restore its international status and support all parties in conflict with the United States.


The Sino-American conflict is based primarily on the economic file, as China has become the second country in the world in terms of economic capacity and production after the United States, and it seeks to become the first productive country by expanding its influence and marketing its goods to include all maps and continents of the world, including the United States and European markets.


The Russian-American conflict is based on indirect clashes, especially in Ukraine, Southeast Asia, and the Arab region in the hot spots: Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, and Somalia.


Second: Iran stands at the forefront of the targets of the clash against the United States and the Israeli colony in two main directions:


The first: working to produce a nuclear bomb, in order to guarantee its entry into the nuclear club and thus end attempts to attack its direct interests. Both Washington and Tel Aviv are working to frustrate Iran and prevent it from obtaining nuclear weapons.


The second: to undermine its influence by eliminating and marginalizing the allies, friends, and tools that depend on it and consider it their political, intellectual, and security reference: the Lebanese Hezbollah, the Yemeni Ansar Allah movement, and many Iraqi parties and figures, or its close allies: Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Palestine.


Both Washington and Tel Aviv, along with some European capitals, and the local ones in some areas of military conflict, or political confrontation and conflict, with economic pressure tools, political isolation, or support for the opposition, and their programs and implementation depend on working through three institutions that play their role, each according to its specialization, which are:


1- The official relations between the governments of Washington and Tel Aviv, which mostly respect the formulas of the alliance and common interests between them, but in many cases there appear differences and interpretations dictated by the interests and partisan backgrounds that do their declared work in showing the differences and conflicts and reflecting that on the positions of the governments of the two parties, despite the American keenness to prevent any international legal or human rights sanctions that could affect the colony, in the decisions of the Security Council and various international institutions: such as UNESCO, human rights committees, and the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court.


But the matter is different for other institutions that are more integrated, harmonious and compatible, which are the institutions of the deep state represented by the two institutions:


1- Military: between the American and Israeli armies.

2- Intelligence: 1- The National Security Agency, American Jack Sullivan and Israeli Tzachi Hanegbi, 2- The American Central Intelligence Agency with the Israeli: A- The external Mossad, B- The internal Shabak.

Tags

Share your opinion

US-Israeli Partnership

MORE FROM OPINIONS

Trump the gambler in his political suit

Safe Mudar Al-Nawati

Yes to prosecuting war criminals and handing them over to international justice

op-ed "AlQuds" dot com

The consequences of Trump's economic policy in the US and the Arab world

Jawad Al-Anani

Three scenarios: the best is bitter... but

Asaad Abdul Rahman

South Lebanon and Gaza between the dialectic of unity of fronts and tactical independence

Marwan Emil Toubasi

Annexation is not destiny!!

Nabhan Khreisha

The American Veto: A True Partnership in the War of Extermination of Our People

op-ed "AlQuds" dot com

Israel exacerbates humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza

op-ed "AlQuds" dot com

The brutality of the occupation between international silence and American support

Sari Al Kidwa

Hochstein came up with a Lebanese version of the Oslo Accords!

Mohammed Alnobani

Syria: Bashar Al-Assad trapped in the heart of the Iran-Israel-Russia triangle

Translation for "Alquds" dot com

As U.S. ambassador, Rev. Mike Huckabee will push for ‘end times’ in Palestine

Mondoweiss

Turmoil at the ICC as fears rise over Israel and the U.S. interference

Mondoweiss

Israeli Newspaper: Why is Netanyahu prepared to accept a cease-fire with Hezbollah but not Hamas?

Haaretz - "Al-Quds" dot com

What's behind Netanyahu's miserable speech?

op-ed "AlQuds" dot com

Consequences of Hezbollah's approval of America's malicious card

Hamdy Farag

How do we thwart the next annexation?

Hani Al Masry

Is there a chance to survive?!

Jamal Zaqout

The Three Pillars of Trump’s Middle East Policy

Nadim Koteich

Trump’s unfinished business for ‘Greater Israel’

972+ Magazine