An American plan for Gaza after “Hamas”

Many Israeli channels are working hard to plan for the aftermath of “Hamas” in Gaza, between proposals and contradictory proposals, and on the premise of achieving victory! And racing on the wing of the wind are American research centers!

We did not find anyone more concerned about the security of “Israel” than the Washington Center for Near East Policy, which left tons of bombs to destroy the Gaza Strip and cause thousands of casualties in continuous massacres in Gaza and the West Bank, with the accumulation of corpses of children, the elderly, and men everywhere, blind to all but looking at the Israeli victims. 

To assure the Israelis who are busy with war that he cares about them more than them! He continues to consider how to manage Gaza after “Hamas” in the plan he presents to the Israeli and American decision-makers.
After the Center defines its historical view of the event from the first sentence when it says: “Hamas committed the worst mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust,” it does not make the slightest reference (as a matter of objectivity) to the black Zionist history and the series of massacres from the Nakba until today.
The Center does not refer to the Palestinian right, even in a state of what is available (a 22% state), in what is an exaggeration by breathing air from the nostrils of Israeli leaders only, and what is a continuation or anticipation of the Western colonial exaggeration that came to Cairo to announce the abstraction of a new Western colonial invasion of the entire Arab region, which He called on the Egyptian presidency, which was disappointed with the conference, to issue a statement that expresses sadness for human values and morals and mourns the world that only sees with one eye one of the strongest statements in support of the Palestinian cause or right.

We return to the Washington Center and to the Center’s leading trio, Robert Satloff, Dennis Ross, and David McCluskey, who worked hard to provide a solution to the Israeli occupation (https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/israels-war-aims-and-principles-post-hamas-administration-gaza10/17/2023) after the fall of Hamas, and of course behind it was the idea of revolution and resistance as a whole, as we mentioned in a previous article, and they even went so far as to point out Until this solution will mean the end of the Palestinian issue between the lines.

What do the Americans want after Hamas, according to the Washington Institute?
The center poses “After Victory in Battle”! It is necessary to define the features of the next day, as planning for this will “provide a banner under which Israel’s allies can come together to support its cause, and an umbrella under which the weak Arab peace partners can take shelter while awaiting the end of the fighting.”

The Center proposes that the general principles are to end Hamas’ control over Gaza without any delay and leave it under rubble, and the three demands of the Israeli government must be met, which are as follows:
- Ensuring that Hamas is unable to launch attacks in the future.
-Restoring Israelis’ confidence in the ability of their government and army to provide them with security.
-Re-establishing Israel's deterrent power in the eyes of friends and adversaries throughout the Middle East.

The Center clearly defines the American role through:
-Helping Israel achieve this goal at the lowest possible cost in terms of causing casualties among Palestinian civilians.
-Deterring Israel's other enemies so that the country can focus on achieving success as quickly as possible.
-Help Israelis and Palestinians begin planning now for the governance vacuum that may result from the end of Hamas’ rule.

What is the plan for governance after Hamas?
In light of the previous principles and affirmations, the Center proposes the necessity of forming a “temporary administration” to rule and administer the Gaza Strip within the “transitional period” it proposes for three years, stressing unequivocally that the temporary may become permanent!?

Meaning that the idea of timing is to deceive the world and circumvent Palestinian legitimacy, whether represented by the Palestinian National Authority or the Liberation Organization, which is not mentioned, neither from afar nor from afar, and of course the Palestinian state is not mentioned, even as a courtesy!
The American plan presented by the Center is based on the necessity of maintaining the idea of two separate entities in the West Bank versus one in the Gaza Strip!? Despite the timid or evasive signs of approaching or moving away from some role for the Palestinian National Authority, which he accuses and belittles its role and does not see in it any real value.
The features of the American plan are based on three pillars: establishing a “civil administration,” a “public safety/law enforcement apparatus” (a new name for the police and security) that will be handed over to a number of Arab countries (temporarily), and third, an international coalition for reconstruction led by America, and clearly paying money. And explicitly in the center’s analysis are both the United Arab Emirates, as “the UAE, which is a peace partner with Israel, and possesses sufficient financial resources to be a major donor,” and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia!

“Civil Administration”: They explain their solution thus, as the “Civil Administration” they are proposing for Gaza consists of: “Technocrats from Gaza, the West Bank, and the Palestinian diaspora, in addition to important local figures from the towns and clans of the Gaza Strip managing local government departments operating at full capacity...”
They add that "continued contact between the Interim Administration in Gaza and Israel will constitute a necessary, even sensitive, issue in a world in which Hamas is no longer a political or military force in Gaza." Then talk begins about a port and a weak beginning to find a break in the siege, with a clear justification for the siege. object!

Unambiguously, the “civil administration” of Gaza’s relationship with the Palestinian technocrats has a “natural connection to the Palestinian Authority,” but with a strong emphasis that the “interim administration” will “work independently within the framework described here.” This means “lying with your own eyes” and maintaining the idea of tearing apart any Palestinian connection with the same previous Israeli approach, which the Center is clearly following!

How can it be, according to the Center, that the “civilian administration” of Gaza is linked to the Palestinian Authority, and the second during the years of the temporary-permanent civil administration of Gaza according to the plan will be matched by the “process of reforming the Palestinian Authority” in a clear burying of the idea of the independence of the State of Palestine, existing by natural and legal rights and existing under occupation.
“Public Safety Apparatus”: The trio in the Washington Center propose that the Arab countries with relations with Israel send “police detachments and not regular military units” to assume the role of the “Public Safety Apparatus,” provided that “the force is led by an officer from a country that has no regional connection to the regions.” Palestinian territories, such as Morocco,” with the necessity of having “liaison offices with the Israeli and Egyptian armies.”

Reconstruction Alliance: With the participation of the Europeans, United Nations agencies, and countries charged with advancing reconstruction, the necessary American role is the greatest, as they state, and fundamental because it is “capable of achieving mobilization, organizing efforts, and even ensuring the implementation of all elements of the plan.” The trio at the center do not forget to point out the necessity of American companies, of course, undertaking reconstruction and reconstruction in Gaza after “Hamas.” America must always gain from more and more calamities, massacres, and calamities.
Out of confusion about how the world will adopt this plan, the trio proposes ideas such as authorizing the Security Council for America to do so, or alternatively authorizing the Arab League, or within the mandate of the “United Nations Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process,” which may not require additional measures from Side of the Security Council,” but the Center stresses that “in the end, it may be necessary to build the ‘Interim Administration in Gaza’ as an alliance of the willing.”