Why does Hamas insist on the condition of stopping the war?

Hamas' insistence on the condition of stopping the war at the end of the second phase of the booby-trapped truce raises a series of pending questions.

The first of these questions: Is there anything in the rogue state’s biography throughout the years of conflict that would lead to the belief that it adheres to the agreements it signs, the most important of which is the Oslo Accords, which were signed publicly in the White House?

Didn't Hamas reinforce this certainty and urge it in its literature, speeches, and the sermons of its sheikhs on the pulpits on all religious occasions, that Israel does not fulfill its promises and does not abide by its covenants?

Isn’t Netanyahu’s retreat from what he signed in the first phase, and his fabrication of flimsy excuses to justify his not entering the second phase, enough to understand the approach of deception, lying, and fabricating excuses to overturn the agreements that are signed before the ink dries?

Do Hamas negotiators believe that Netanyahu will fail to find a way to create a pretext to return to war, as he has returned to it time and time again without justification, the latest of which was his war that he is waging on the camps in the north, under the pretext of bombing buses that he kept secret, after its threads were conveyed to Jews involved in it?

Isn't what the liar is doing today, starving and bombing from afar, a form of war?

The condition of stopping the war was not among the goals of the “liberation war” that Hamas launched on October 7, which it embarked on with a miscalculation and political bet on allies who were involved and whose calculations were exposed, who lost their assets, and who returned from the support war with broken teeth and amputated limbs.

Necessities, precise calculations, the disintegration of allies, and disappointment from brothers and friends, Arabs and Muslims, who were unable to bring in a bag of flour without Israel’s approval, dictate that Hamas proceed with ending the detainees’ crisis in exchange for clearing the prisons, because there is no value to any commitment or agreement that Israel signs today and turns against tomorrow in a world that buys its narrative, gives free rein to its crimes, and holds the victim responsible for the causes of his death!

The daily violations committed by Israel in southern Lebanon and the Golan Heights, with the approval of the Americans who have placed themselves in the position of both adversary and judge, are sufficient evidence of bad intentions.