Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo
Logo

OPINIONS

Sun 01 Dec 2024 10:25 am - Jerusalem Time

Washington Post: Netanyahu reached an agreement with Hezbollah, so why not with Hamas?

The Washington Post said that the Lebanese Hezbollah, despite its greatly diminished military power, is far from having been defeated by the Israeli army, let alone destroyed.


The American newspaper reported that Hezbollah fired about 250 rockets and other missiles last Sunday - just two days before the ceasefire was announced - at targets in central and northern Israel, in one of the most violent barrages of rockets it has fired in months.


The Israeli government has not published any estimates of Hezbollah's casualties, unlike what happened with the Palestinian resistance movement (Hamas), which the newspaper considered evidence that the numbers are not impressive enough to announce.


Hezbollah is still strong

However, the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies claimed that Hezbollah has lost a total of 2,450 fighters out of an estimated 40 to 50 thousand.


According to the Washington Post report, Hezbollah still has tens of thousands of missiles and fighters with which it can rebuild its military capabilities and return to southern Lebanon, which borders Israel, regardless of what is stipulated in the ceasefire agreement, which went into effect last Wednesday, after the two sides agreed to an agreement brokered by the United States and France.


That decision called for Hezbollah fighters to withdraw to the north of the Litani River (about 32 kilometers from the Israeli border) and for the Lebanese army to deploy its forces to secure southern Lebanon.


Although the United Nations peacekeeping forces were supposed to monitor the parties’ compliance with the terms of the agreement, the Washington Post says that the peacekeepers have no authority to do anything but stand by as Hezbollah works to fortify itself.


Netanyahu’s concerns

The newspaper recalled the ceasefire agreement that was concluded after the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 2006, and reported that it did not prevent Hezbollah from strengthening its forces on Israel’s northern border, and the new agreement reached this week will not prevent it from doing so.


The report added that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was keen this time to keep the ground attack within a few kilometers of the Israeli border to avoid getting bogged down in a costly quagmire.


Although Netanyahu will not admit it publicly, his calculations in private seem to indicate that Israel can live with Hezbollah fighters on its border as long as it deters them from actually attacking it, according to the report.


The American newspaper wondered why Netanyahu was not willing to strike a similar deal with Hamas. It pointed out that the Israeli Prime Minister pledged, in the speech in which he announced the ceasefire in Lebanon, that he would complete the mission of eliminating Hamas, a mission that Israeli military leaders say they cannot achieve.


Hamas

The newspaper expressed its belief that Netanyahu does not show much interest in a ceasefire with the Palestinian movement, which would result in the release of prisoners.


The Washington Post quoted veteran US diplomat Aaron David Miller as saying in an email that the deal with Lebanon was easier for Netanyahu, "but in Gaza, he knows that Hamas will not release the (Israeli) prisoners without major concessions, such as the release of a large number of Palestinian prisoners accused of killing Israelis and ending the war."


He explained that an agreement in this regard in Gaza could lead to the collapse of the ruling right-wing coalition in Israel, while Netanyahu intends to keep the army in Gaza for the coming months.


The newspaper confirmed in its report that US President-elect Donald Trump may be able to pressure Netanyahu to bring peace to the Gaza Strip, which is something that current President Joe Biden has not been able to do.


Source: Washington Post+Al Jazeera

Tags

Share your opinion

Washington Post: Netanyahu reached an agreement with Hezbollah, so why not with Hamas?

MORE FROM OPINIONS

19-1-2025 A day for history

op-ed "AlQuds" dot com

Facts we do not disagree on in this war

Ahmed Rafiq Awad

The measure of victory and defeat in unequal battles.. The Al-Aqsa Flood as an example

Mohammed Alnobani

After the truce.. the genocide criminals must be held accountable

Majdi Al-Shomali

Hamas achievement

Hamada Faraana

Post-aggression moment

Azzam Abdul Karim Rushdi Al Shawa

The last hope for the security prisoners of the 1948 Palestinians

Ibrahim Abdullah Sarsour

Lessons of the "Flood" and its Repercussions (3) The Exposure of the Arab "State"

Dr. Iyad Al-Barghouthi

There is nothing after the night but the dawn of glory that rises!

Ibrahim Melhem

The biggest challenge during the truce: restoring the status of the Palestinian cause as a political issue, and preventing the occupation from returning to implement its plans of genocide and displacement

Walid Al-Awad

Israeli treachery

op-ed - Al-Quds dot com

This war that is approaching its end.. What did it say and what did it reveal?

Rassem Obaidat

Stop repeating mistakes and tampering with the fate of the Palestinian people

Iyad Abu Hajar

Victory speech

Hossam Abu Al-Nasr

On the issue of governance in Gaza

Dr. Ali Al Jarbawi

The will triumphed over genocide

op-ed - Al-Quds dot com

The West Bank between the hammer of the Israeli army and the anvil of the settlers

The truce deal

Hamada Faraana

After the ceasefire: the psychological battle does not end

Ramallah - “Al-Quds” dot com

Prominent American writer: Political power is in Israel's favor, but justice will prevail

Translation for "Alquds" dot com