Missing Palestine

Written by: Nidal Muhammad Watad

In its recent reports, the Israeli occupation was forced to admit that the fire of the Palestinian resistance spread through the armed groups, which began with the "Jenin Battalion" and extended with the emergence of the "Lions' Den" in Nablus, then finally the "Hawks' Den" in Tulkarem, and reports about the "Aswad" group. Right" in Hebron.

The confession came on the lips of security sources with the “Wala” website, which highlighted in the same context the state of the Palestinian popular embrace of these groups, as a source of great concern for the occupation that threatens to break and thwart its continuous aggression since last March on the West Bank, under the pretext of striking terrorist “cells” and restoring order to the camp. Jenin and Jenin Governorate.

The emergence of these groups brings to mind the groups that posed the greatest challenge to the occupation in the first intifada in 1987, and they were manifested by the "Black Panthers" in the Jenin region, the "Eagles" in Nablus, and the "Fatah Hawks" in the Gaza Strip, with the main difference being that the Intifada groups The first enjoyed the full support of the PLO, and at that time constituted a field sword in support of the Palestinian negotiator.

Today, these groups find themselves pursued by the occupation itself.

The failure of the occupying state to launch a swift and geographically limited campaign increases the brutality of its attacks and crimes, especially in light of the success of the commando operations and the elements that carried them out in embarrassing the intelligence of the occupying state and its army, as was evident in the operation of the "Ma'aleh Adumim" settlement, east of Jerusalem, which was carried out by And Uday al-Tamimi was martyred while the occupation was besieging the Shuafat camp and searching for him there.

However, the most dangerous thing that is happening on the land of the occupied West Bank and Jerusalem is not the continuation of the aggression, but rather the absence of all of Palestine from the general Arab awareness, and from the international awareness.

Even in light of the issuance of a new UN report on Israeli war crimes, we do not see a single actual step of solidarity from the Arab countries that goes beyond statements of denunciation, nor does it transcend or transcend them to stop normalization, restore ambassadors for consultations, or reduce the level of relations, while Australia declares, Suddenly, it retracted its prior recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel.

It is shameful and disgraceful nationally that Palestine and its people do not find a real support in the face of the longest occupation that threatens all Arab national security, and that Palestine is not enough. About "Arab 48"