Israeli fingers move the war in Sudan

The Israeli proposal to mediate between the Sudanese generals of war, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Muhammad Hamdan Dagalo (Hamedti), seemed closer to a smug joke, strange and illogical, and it contains much more propaganda than serious elements that enable the occupying state and apartheid to mediate between those who destroyed their countries before and during the war. In continuation of this logic of Samaja, a spokesman for one of the two parties compared the attack on his forces to what Israel is being exposed to at the hands of Palestinian "terrorism"!!

But the serious question arises: What does Israel possess more than countries closely related to Sudan, such as Egypt and Ethiopia? In addition to international and regional organizations such as the United Nations, the Arab League, and the African Union, all of which have experience, knowledge, and communication with the parties to Sudanese society, which enables them to intervene in the interest of the Sudanese people first.

The strangest thing is that the US administration is the one that encouraged Israel to mediate between the two parties, as if it believes that the normalization relations into which Sudan was introduced against the will of its people are more important and influential than the historical, cultural, national and religious ties that bind Sudan to its regional surroundings.

When talking about Sudan, it must be recalled that the sons and soldiers of this brotherly country participated in the struggle for Palestine, and many of them fell martyrs. A joint British-Egyptian administration is in fact a purely British administration that is biased towards Israel. The memories of this participation are still present through naming the site "Al-Sudaniyya" in the northern Gaza Strip after those forces. Sudan also officially participated in the 1967 war on the Egyptian front and in the October 1973 war, and it was one of the countries that hosted a section of the Palestinian revolutionary forces after they left Beirut in 1982.

The recent and distant history testifies that Israel has always conspired against Sudan. The lands of this country were subjected to several attacks by the Israeli air force under the pretext of using it by the Palestinian resistance movements. Its land and sovereignty were also violated through suspicious deals with Jaafar al-Numeiri behind the back of the people to smuggle the Jews of Ethiopia. In recent years, Israel has supported the generals of war at the expense of the rest of the civilian components of the Sudanese people, including parties, unions and civil institutions.

Sudan, for a long time before the secession of its south, was the largest Arab country in terms of area, and the most promising country due to its natural resources, which made it the object of ambition of the colonial countries. Since its inception, Israel has adopted the policy of the "periphery alliance", a doctrine adopted by Ben-Gurion and based on rapprochement with the non-Arab countries surrounding the Arab world, building security and military alliances and good relations with them against the Arab countries. It also supported separatist movements in a number of Arab countries, and this policy continued in various forms against the unity of Sudan by supporting separatist movements not only in the south, but also in Darfur and eastern Sudan as well. The conspiracy against Sudan, its territorial integrity and strategic interests also included Israel's support for the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam project, and the encouragement of Addis Ababa to proceed with this project without any consideration for the interests of Egypt and Sudan and without understanding with them.

Of course, these positions were not out of love for South Sudan and its people, but rather a desire to divide and fragment Sudan. In this context, the southerners alone cannot be held responsible for secession. Rather, the leaders of Sudan, especially its corrupt generals, bear responsibility for the policies of marginalization, neglect, racial discrimination, and ignoring the cultural peculiarities that prompted southerners to favor separation.

The Israeli fingers of absurdity did not stop at this point. Israel sought to dominate South Sudan and use it as a platform to continue infiltrating Africa, and it played a suspicious role in fueling internal disputes that reached the point where Israeli arms companies supported the two warring parties in South Sudan, which are forces President Salva Kiir and his deputy Riek Machar's forces.

Israel, which is now building a complex system of occupation and apartheid against the Palestinians, has never been friendly or tolerant with other Arabs and Africans. It had distinguished relations with the defunct apartheid regime in South Africa and Rhodesia, even to the point of joint nuclear tests. In the sixties of the last century.

This racism is not just fleeting momentary attitudes of some politicians and their parties, but rather it is a component part of the Zionist ideology that believes that the Jews are fundamentally distinct from other peoples of the earth, and therefore this racist attitude was reflected in dealing with the Jews of Ethiopia (Flashmora) and on some Africans who were led by their bad luck To Israel, most of them came from Sudan and South Sudan by land via Egypt, so that in 2019 Benjamin Netanyahu raised the slogan of liberating south Tel Aviv, and he intended by that to get rid of African migrants by forcibly returning them to their country, or to a third country that agrees to receive them in exchange for a financial reward ( At the time, the names of Rwanda and Burundi were proposed, so that Israel would give them five thousand dollars for each refugee.

Israel would not have persisted in its conspiracy and ambitions in Sudan had it not been for two factors: the disintegration of the Arab official system and the failure of its institutions, especially the Arab League, as well as the selfish and selfish ambitions of the warlords and generals who have been controlling Sudan’s capabilities for decades, leading their country from failure to failure, and from disaster To another, and perhaps the greatest evidence that the interests of their people are the last thing that matters to them is that the two poles of the current war are yesterday's partners in the coup against the civilian components of the Sovereignty Council, and they are the two blatant symbols of the humiliating normalization of Sudan's history, identity and historical affiliation.