The exacerbation of contradictory phenomena in the Israeli colony

Two prominent phenomena sweeping the Israeli colony:

The first is the phenomenon of extremism among right-wing political parties and extremism among ultra-Orthodox Jewish religious parties.

The second phenomenon is the sharp disagreements and differences between Israeli decision-making institutions, and between them and Israeli society, and the emergence of the phenomenon of street protests against government policies and choices.

The phenomenon of extremism is an expression of "political philosophy" and a sense of arrogance, against the backdrop of Palestinian and Arab weakness in general, and because of the unlimited American support for the continuation of the colony's expansionist, occupying, and substitutionary options, and because of the slow change in the weak European transformations. Europe is the one that created the colony: Britain's decisions, and the facilities it provided to the Zionist movement in settling and colonizing Palestine against the backdrop of the Balfour Declaration and its repercussions, and France's conventional and nuclear weapons that made the colony a state feared by the Arab countries, and Germany provided financial compensation as an alternative to the massacres to which the Jews were subjected, in addition to the human energy of foreign German Jews with superior professional ability, which contributed to the advancement of society and the colony in a distinctive way, and helped it achieve a qualitative superiority in confronting the Arabs who did not possess the ability, coverage, and qualified human energy to confront the colony's superiority and capabilities.

Extremism is evident in settlement, expansion, and the insistence on transforming Jerusalem into the unified capital of the colony. This is done to Israelize, Judaize, and Hebraize it through human settlement and the establishment of institutions that impose standards of change and reduce the Arab, Palestinian, Islamic, and Christian presence in the holy city.

The ruling coalition in the colony acts as if the West Bank is not Palestinian, is not Arab, is not occupied, but rather Judea and Samaria. Accordingly, they work to dissipate and fragment the Palestinian Arab presence, as they did in the camps in the northern West Bank, the demolitions in Jerusalem, the displacement of its residents, and the construction of settlements on its ruins.

This ruling group also declares that it is against the establishment of a Palestinian state and supports the reduction of the Palestinian Arab presence in the rest of Palestine.

As for the manifestations of conflicts and disagreements between the various Israeli institutions, this is due to:

1- The surprise operation on October 7, 2023, which shocked the military, security, official and civilian components of Israeli society. The army commissioned an investigation committee into the “negligence” it committed, and a report was issued on that. The intelligence service commissioned an investigation committee, and the result was that it bears responsibility for the failure. Meanwhile, Netanyahu evades forming an investigation committee with the government, so as not to bear responsibility for the “negligence” and be exposed to conviction and trial. He refuses to form an investigation committee in advance under the pretext that he is still in a state of war against the “Palestinian enemy.”

Secondly, the failure suffered by the colony, the surprise of October 7, and the failure of the Israeli attack and invasion of the Gaza Strip, which did not achieve its declared goals:

1- Release of Israeli prisoners without an exchange.

2- Ending and eliminating the Palestinian resistance, especially the Hamas and Jihad movements.

3- Expulsion and displacement of the Palestinians from the Gaza Strip to Sinai.

Third, there is disagreement over whether to continue the war after fifteen months of failure. Netanyahu is seeking to continue the war to avoid forming an investigative committee, while the military and intelligence leadership insists that there is no longer any strategic objective achievable in the Gaza Strip that would require continuing the war. Therefore, they have publicly rejected the continuation of the war.

Fourth, Netanyahu's change of military and security leadership: 1- Minister of Defense, 2- Chief of Staff, 3- Director of Mossad, 4- Director of Military Intelligence, Aman, 5- and his decision to dismiss the Director of Shin Bet, the internal security service. This decision sparked widespread criticism, especially since the State Comptroller and Attorney General rejected the dismissal and appealed it, deeming it illegal.

Fifth, demonstrations by the families of the Israeli prisoners who were not released, and sympathized with them and participated in the protest and demonstration: 1- The families of the dead soldiers whose sons fell without achieving any political goals, but rather the result of the war was failure and debacle, 2- The families of the soldiers who have been in reserve for a long time, without political benefit, and their refusal to continue the war without goals that can be achieved.

The development, aggravation and shortcomings sweeping the Israeli colony are unprecedented in their intensity and division, and will have repercussions open to all negative possibilities.

...........

Extremism is evident in settlement, expansion, and the insistence on transforming Jerusalem into the unified capital of the colony. It is thus being Israelized, Judaized, and Hebraized through human settlement.