Genocide and the Reality of a Crisis-ridden State

Despite America's support for Israel, the latter feels isolated globally and finds itself facing increasing diplomatic isolation due to its war in Gaza. Despite this, the extremist occupation government has become uninterested in what is said about it or in the unprecedented level of direct accusations of committing war crimes and genocide that it has reached, and that it does not care about what the world thinks of it, while it has become an unsafe country for many Israelis residing in it, most of whom have already left it for good.

Netanyahu dominated the scene through his positions and determination to change the face of the Middle East, while Israel lacked security and calm and was no longer able to convince Israelis to provide stability, as Israel became permanently isolated and became an unsafe country for many Israelis, especially those with dual citizenship, and many of them admit to being uncomfortable because they do not hear from Netanyahu any realistic end except more conflict, and they admit that they were shocked by the speed with which Israel lost global sympathy and the consequences of that and their reality and living future.

The genocidal war and the reality of the troubled state reflected a new strategy for the dominance of the Israeli right, and carried trends in reshaping the Middle East. The extremist voices within the most right-wing government in Israel’s history raise fears of what some call “expansionist aspirations toward what is known as ‘Greater Israel’,” as the extremist bloc believes that it can expand to what is known in Israel between the Tigris and Euphrates, and they declare openly through maps in front of which they take pictures that they will not be satisfied with Gaza.

Such expansionist aspirations across borders cannot be on the current agenda of the occupation government, despite the fact that the far-right bloc adopts such slogans. In fact, the image that revolves in Netanyahu’s mindset at the present time and what he can draw across the new Middle East remains about enabling Israel to settle the remaining Palestinian lands, reoccupy the Gaza Strip and annex the West Bank. Israel does not hide its intentions regarding extending its settlement project, and has explicitly announced its intention to double the number of settlers to one million, despite the Arab and international criticism that this has received.

Within the Israeli political scene, there are a number of ministers in the far-right government who do not believe in the two-state solution, and now we seem farther away from the establishment of a Palestinian state than we have been since the Oslo Accords, but it is not possible to believe that the international community will agree to these Israeli maps that are devoid of Palestinian lands, as all the data confirm that the Israeli perspective of the new Middle East cannot be achieved and is difficult to become a reality, and the Palestinian people disappear from the scene once the occupation’s liquidation plans are implemented.

The occupying state cannot continue its war without providing comprehensive and integrated support and adopting the Israeli project by the United States of America, which worked during the war to provide military, political and financial support to the extremist government, and supplied it with the appropriate weapons to wage its war, and provided it with international political cover by using the right of veto in the UN Security Council more than three times to prevent the passage of resolutions condemning Israel, as it provided great support to Israel to ensure its strategic superiority, and intensified its military presence in light of the increasing tension and instability in the region.