OPINIONS
Fri 12 Jan 2024 5:13 pm - Jerusalem Time
Justice for Palestine or "Might Makes Right" will prevails
By John Whitbeck
Today's Israeli defense in the ICJ genocide case was a painful-to-watch flood of substantive lies and distortions which should be obvious anyone who has been paying attention to Israel's actions and publicly expressed intentions over the past three months and which judges who have been paying attention should have found insulting, objectionable and prejudicial to Israel's defense.
Extraordinarily, the Israeli legal team argued that the Hamas attack of October 7 meets the legal definition of "genocide" and that South Africa is therefore complicit in genocide, while everything that Israel has done in Gaza since October 7 has not only been in legitimate self-defense but in full compliance with international law, with constant attention to avoiding or mitigating any harm to Palestinian civilians.
However, there was one technical argument to which the Israeli legal team paid considerable attention which is potentially worrying -- that, prior to December 29, when South Africa submitted its application to the ICJ, there was no "dispute" between South Africa and Israel, as is necessary to establish ICJ jurisdiction in this case.
Somehow, this technical argument does not appear to have been an obstacle to Gambia's genocide case against Myanimar, but it may be Israel's best hope in this case and could be seized upon by any judge reluctant to anger the American and Israeli governments.
I would hope that no judge other than the American judge will be tempted to seize this escape route.
If the ICJ does not decisively order all or most of the "provisional measures" sought by South Africa, it will, in my view, be definitively destroying the very concept of international law which Israel and the United States have done so much to destroy or deform in recent decades, giving a legal green light to continuing genocide and restoring "Might Makes Right" as the only functional principle of international relations.
Much more than the potential relief of Palestinians from the genocidal assault currently being inflicted upon them is at stake in this case.
Tags
MORE FROM OPINIONS
The View Within Israel Turns Bleak
The New York Times
Israel's difficult choices after Rafah
Ahmed Rafiq Awad
Brief Talk
Ibrahim Melhem
US focused on hunting down Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar, in bid to end Gaza war
Middle East Eye
Video: Why Israel Is in Deep Trouble
JOHN J. MEARSHEIMERMAY
Palestine and Israel... from the Jewish Holocaust to the Palestinian Holocaust
Ibrahim Abrash
The least that can be said
Ibrahim Melhem
The Limits of Moralism in Israel and Gaza
Ross Douthat
The Limits of the Biden-Netanyahu ‘Dispute’... Above the Rubble of Rafah
Eyad Abu Shakra
French academic: Biden has declared himself a Zionist since 1973
Translation for "Al-Quds" dot com
Under the Pretext of “Antisemitism”, the Suppression of the Palestinian People is Accompanied by an Attempt to Suppress the Defense of their Cause
YAANI.fr
Podcast: 7 Months on, How Would a Breakthrough look? Ehud Olmert, Dr Nasser Alkidwa & Thomas Friedman
Ramallah - "Al-Quds" dot com
What Hamas Wants in Postwar Gaza
Foreign Affairs
Hebrew Media: What is behind Biden's threat to stop supplying weapons to Israel?
Institute for National Security Studies
Biden’s war on Gaza is now a war on truth and the right to protest
Jonathan Cook
Gaza is the greatest test liberalism has faced since 1945. And it is failing
Middle East Eye
Student protests upend hegemony on Israel and Palestine forever
Middle East Eye
What will follow from the start of the attack on Rafah, and where is the movement heading in the Middle East?
Translation for "Al-Quds" dot com
They Used to Say Arabs Can’t Have Democracy Because It’d Be Bad for Israel. Now the U.S. Can’t Have It Either.
The Intercept
Netanyahu and Hamas are playing politics over a Gaza truce
Prospects
Share your opinion
Justice for Palestine or "Might Makes Right" will prevails