OPINIONS
Mon 01 Jan 2024 9:27 am - Jerusalem Time
The Gaza War and the Palestine War!
![](https://alquds.fra1.digitaloceanspaces.com/uploads/b41879f66d4eba0837504927563ace98.webp)
In politics, preferring intentions over outcomes, and action - any kind of action - over thinking, and choosing the noisy and tumultuous over the calm or measured, are among the defining characteristics of a romantic mindset.
We thus see, for instance, that the call for establishing a "Palestinian state," which the Palestine Liberation Organization advocated after realizing that violent methods were a dead end, and which was later endorsed by Arab and international states and institutions, did not become a popular slogan that spoke to and stimulated the popular imagination. This slogan has always seemed insufficient for alleviating the masses’ accumulated frustrations. Moreover, it does not turn attention away from genuine concerns in the countries around Palestine, concerns that some regimes in our region were keen on turning attention away from. Consequently, the slogan of a "Palestinian state" is a "dwarf" compared to the "giant" that is "liberating Palestine from the river to the sea, annihilating Israel," or "liberating Al-Aqsa." That is part of a robust tradition of Arab political culture: even Gamal Abdel Nasser, who is not generally associated with workable strategies, could not make his famous yet modest slogan of "removing the effects of aggression" popular, unlike almost everything else associated with the Egyptian leader.
However, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his friends on the furthest end of the Israeli right, thought differently: they knew that the “giant” slogan did not scare them, and that, in the end, it was hot air that would vanish in the heat of the Arab streets. If it did scare them, they could dispel their fears through their military and technological superiority and their infinite capacity for killing Palestinians. When Iran became the region's largest giant slogan factory, the Israelis became more convinced that the real issue was not the slogans but the specter of Iran developing a nuclear weapon. As for the slogans, they are frail to an extent that has rendered them a game Tehran uses.
Netanyahu and his political school were and remain consistent on one matter: they are afraid of seeing this Palestinian state that has failed to capture our collective imagination come to light, as the emergence of such a state is feasible in principle. Moreover, the unequivocal justness of this demand undermines the narrative that Netanyahu and his allies have been using to blackmail the world: Israel’s existence is constantly questioned and threatened. On the other hand, such a state fulfills both Arab and international demands, paving the path for its legitimation.
This awareness led Netanyahu to bet on killing it, sometimes through procrastination and evasion, breeding despair among Palestinians and leaving the world disillusioned, and at others through direct violence, which began with the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin by an extremist right-winger (a move that found a partner in Arab and Iranian rejectionists, albeit from opposite position), and thirdly, by supporting Hamas. Since October 7, Israeli and international media outlets have been brimming with reports about the Israeli leader's facilitations to the Islamic movement, be it by allowing the entry of Qatari aid into the Gaza Strip or consistently giving Gazan workers preferential treatment. This support aimed to foster a distinct entity in Gaza that encouraged independence from the West Bank.
With a Palestinian state seemingly the only possible theoretical solution, Netanyahu's war on the Oslo Accords continues. He recently called it the founding father of the October 7 attack and took a hard line in opposing the return of the “Ramallah Authority” to Gaza.
The fact is that Israel can, as we are seeing today, retaliate to the Hamas attack with security and military operations, and by ratcheting up its genocidal brutality, which is helped by the fact that Hamas is a non-state actor. On the other hand, the attack helps strengthen the hateful ideology of the extreme right - the Likud's bloc also calls for a state “from the river to the sea,” as well as reinforcing accusations of anti-Semitism, which are brandished with or without reason to blackmail others. In addition, the October 7 attacks could be used as a pretext for bringing the global far-right together in backing a universal war against “ISIS terrorism,” as Netanyahu called it, and in the meantime getting away with paying the massive debt the Israelis owe the Palestinians. As for a legitimate Palestinian state, it is the only thing that could undermine this extreme right ideology and its raison d'etre, deny Netanyahu the talking points that Hamas provides him with, liberate the Palestinian cause from the clutches of Iranian-Israeli competition, and end wars instead of fanning their flames in perpetuity.
In this sense, two wars are being fought today: a destructive one, the Gaza war, and a political one, the Palestine war. While some have claimed that October 7 “put Palestine on the table,” the total opposite seems to be true, unless the Gaza war manages to find shade under the Palestine war and the forces of Gaza can stand behind the forces of Ramallah. That is perhaps precisely what is being engineered today in Cairo and Doha, and perhaps elsewhere as well.
However, the theoretical solution, the Palestinian state, will not emerge unless we see shifts in Palestine itself, as well as Israel. Besides the Israelis removing Netanyahu and his ilk and showing genuine readiness to resolve the settlement issue (there are 750,000 of them) in a way that paves the way for a Palestinian state, what is required, above all else, is sharpening a Palestinian political instrument and rendering it vigorous and dynamic, qualities that do not apply to the current Ramallah authority. Although bringing about this happy eventuality will not be simple, easy, or swift, its slow emergence late on certainly remains better than its non-occurrence.
Source: Alsharq Alawsat
Tags
MORE FROM OPINIONS
The war of starvation...the most dangerous weapon against our people
op-ed Al Quds dot com
Israeli writer: Netanyahu's method of running the state has become bankrupt and poses a threat to its security
Haaretz- "Al-Quds" dot com
Annexation and extermination are two sides of the same war
Jamal Zaqout
Smotrich accelerates measures to undermine the national authority
op-ed Al Quds dot com
Changing the authority is a condition for its survival and for it not to turn into a puppet authority
Hani Al-Masry
The Israeli army and government: the struggle of strategy and status
Muhannad Mustafa
Taking a Risk, Israel’s Netanyahu Continues To Butt Heads With White House
Medialine
Palestinians Don’t Want Hamas To Rule Postwar Gaza
Medialine
An intentional and contrived Israeli uproar
Hamada Pharaoh
Netanyahu's options
Fathi Ahmed
Why Netanyahu Doesn’t Take Biden Seriously
New York Times
Israel's alliance with Europe’s fascists is the greatest threat to Jewish people
Middle East Eye
Israel and coming down from the tree!!
op-ed Al Quds dot com
About the escalation in the war in northern Palestine
Mounir Shafiq
Watch| Israel, the ICC and the global structures of power | Norman Finkelstein | The Big Picture S4E12
Middle East Eye
World Refugee Day...a station for rebuilding lives
op-ed Al Quds dot com
Netanyahu, Gantz, and the war cabinet
Nabil Amr
Why Palestinian Unity Matters
Foreign Affairs
The American Foreign Aid Package and Its Implications
The Institute of National Security Studies
Hamas is bound by international law. But compliance is a different matter.
New York Times
Share your opinion
The Gaza War and the Palestine War!