Blurred Netanyahu's speech

"There is no return to the 1967 borders, and the Jordan River is Israel's eastern borders, and the three major settlement blocs in the north, center and south of the West Bank will remain under Israeli sovereignty," with this statement former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin summarized the matter after signing the Oslo Accords in 1993. It has been circulated in the past few days. It is an old and new project that was discussed in the corridors of the Israeli cabinet meetings. It is the annexation of the area between the Ma’ale Adumim settlement and Jerusalem. According to the plan, it was called Greater Jerusalem. Despite the pressure from the White House, not to proceed with this project based on the Aqaba and Sharm understandings. Sheikh, who were both under American auspices, but the opportunity to achieve it remains available at any moment on the ground, as its implementation suggests that, so the follower of what is happening in that region of land confiscation and the erection of military checkpoints would be the beginning of the division of the West Bank, the military barrier located southeast of Jerusalem called " The Container witnessed two decades ago the policy of separation, separating the West Bank from its north to its south.

Netanyahu is following in the footsteps of his predecessor
The absolute ambiguity in Netanyahu's speech was in supporting settlements in the West Bank, which evolved into a demand for annexing the West Bank and the Jordan Valley, and he became more serious in realizing this dream in order to win the settlers' votes in his favour. At that time, it annexed the West Bank sooner or later, and raised the slogan "Jordan has two banks, the first is ours, and the second is ours." The Likud party was also influenced by the ideas of the Mapai party, which recognized the partition decision to gain the support and recognition of the United Nations of the occupying state, a deception used by the leader of the Mapai party, and he succeeded in that, Indeed, on this line and approach, the Prime Minister of Israel is following, and he is winning the United States to his side. In return, he is pressing towards gaining American support in annexing the Arab West Bank. In the way of the Mapai party, a lesson and lessons learned. On approximately 77% of the land of historic Palestine, the West Bank is the second prey that the occupation is trying to devour, even though it took the largest part of it, but it aims to swallow it all.

Zionist schools of thought are one
There are two main projects for the idea of ​​annexing the West Bank, which is the “Igal Allon” project, and the second project is “Matityahu Drupless.” The first project is the annexation of a larger area of ​​the West Bank and a smaller population, and the second project is annexation and an increase in the number of settlers. This is how the Zionist schools of thought appear in ingenuity and good planning. Its thought does not fall by statute of limitations, so if a party is gone, it does not mean that its ideas are dissipated. On the contrary, the Zionist movements and parties will soon work to revive and restore the old thought. Everything that was proposed about Palestine and how to control it from the beginning of the Basel Conference in 1898 until today is an idea that stipulates a Judaization. Palestine and controlling it in many ways, including killing, displacement, and other forms of torture, and this depends on the ideas of their rabbis. Eliezer Melmad, a clergyman belonging to religious Zionism, explained that leaving the West Bank outside Israeli control is forbidden according to Jewish law. Recently, a policy began Annexation or what is being circulated in the media as creeping annexation is embodied in the projects and programs of all right-wing parties, especially the religious Zionist movement, which began to invade the West Bank through settlements and outposts, which fragment the West Bank into isolated areas from each other. According to the beliefs of Zionist Judaism, the land of the West Bank must remain under Israeli control, as this brings closer the return of Christ, and beyond that, control of the West Bank must lead to the construction of the Temple in place of Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The post-Zionist thesis was stillborn
Whoever follows the scene closely will notice that religious Zionism has succeeded to a large extent in imposing its vision regarding control over the Israeli decision represented in the official institutions, as it continues to control the largest part of the West Bank, and this rolling settlement race means in itself the return of Christ the Savior, The new Zionism, under the component of ideological convergence between the secular right and the religious nationalist current, played a major role in increasing settlement and empowering settlers from the West Bank. The occupation of power in the occupying state is considered a shift against the post-Zionist thesis, and this is seen through the behavior of the right-wing government, so the birth of conciliatory Zionism In which all Zionist currents blended under the framework of settlement in all of the land of Palestine, which is a major shift between what was and what is happening today, and between the gap of the ideological and religious dimension that melted into one crucible, and the deep disagreement that was between the orientations of each party, the current scene is one of compatibility and harmony in Achieving the vision of an exclusive Jewish state with one nationality, and there is no place for Arabs in it.