A fragile agreement or is it the king and the kingdom?

The truce agreement between Israel and the resistance is not what many respected analysts tend to describe as "fragile", providing evidence of this with what happened on the first day of Hamas's delay in providing the names of the three female prisoners (British, Romanian and Israeli) for a few hours, during which Israel raised hell, Netanyahu threatened to resume the war, and announced that the ceasefire had not entered into force, even though Hamas explained the reasons for the delay as "security and field reasons". Despite our understanding of these reasons, along with many parties involved and not involved, no one wants to repeat this, except Netanyahu himself and some of his leaders who have resigned and those who are on their way to resigning.

It was very clear how much Hamas cared about implementing the agreement, through the image of the three female prisoners, in good health, good mentality, clean clothes, good treatment, and broad smiles that only indicated gratitude to the kidnappers, as if they were in a palace hospitality whose term had come to an end. It is true that Netanyahu said that they suffered hell, and this may be objectively true, as they and their kidnappers were under siege, surveillance, bombardment, spying, starvation, thirst, and women's needs for 471 days, in fear, anxiety, sadness, and pain. But all of this is because of Netanyahu, who killed fifty thousand people, more than half of whom were children and women. He could have ended all of this last May, as Biden says, that is, half the period of these girls' captivity, but he stubbornly and arrogantly refused to kill his captives, and he could have continued for months had Trump not arrived at the White House.

Did Hamas tell him that the real hell is your prisons, in whose basements you killed more than fifty detainees, the last of whom was the twenty-year-old Mohammed Yassin Jabr from the Deheishe camp, who had been administratively detained for a year, and was killed on the same day of the deal. Not to mention the widespread humiliation, deliberate starvation, and even rape.

Hamas, which appeared strong, sober, responsible, organized, confident, knowledgeable, and capable, did not say anything about delaying the release of the ninety Palestinian prisoners from Ofer until the early hours of yesterday morning, nor about bringing in 330 trucks instead of 600 according to the agreement.

It is clear that Hamas, along with the axis of resistance, realize that Ofer prison, where Israel has gathered the prisoners who are to be released, is nothing but a small prison, compared to the homeland that has been transformed into a large Ofer, where joy is forbidden.

It is not the agreement that is fragile, but rather the mentality of Netanyahu the king and his fascist government, which breathes from the lungs of the biblical kingdom, which is no longer hidden from anyone, and which has become wanted by the courts of extermination and purification at the international level.

Forty-five years ago, the IDF killed the Palestinian activist from the village of Battir, Taghreed al-Batma, on her way to university. At the time, the military spokesman justified the killing by saying that it was a stray bullet. At that time, the world believed them and disbelieved us, but the philosopher and thinker Abdul Latif Aql said: A stray bullet from a stray soldier in a stray state.