Widespread Arab Condemnation of Ben-Gvir's Storming of Al-Aqsa and Warnings of Imposing a New Judaization Reality

Arab and Islamic countries strongly condemned the storming of the courtyards of the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque again by the extremist Israeli National Security Minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir. These official stances came in separate statements issued by Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Qatar, Jordan, and Palestine, describing the move as a blatant assault and an unacceptable provocation to the feelings of Muslims around the world.

Sources reported that Ben-Gvir carried out his incursion through the Mughrabi Gate under tight security protection from occupation forces, where he conducted a provocative tour in the courtyards of Al-Haram Al-Sharif. This violation coincided with the continued closure of Al-Aqsa Mosque by the occupation authorities to Palestinian worshippers for the thirty-ninth consecutive day, which intensified the popular and official anger.

For its part, the Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressed its strong condemnation of this action, describing it as a blatant incursion that defies international will. The Kingdom affirmed its categorical rejection of such practices that undermine peace efforts and target the existing legal and historical status in occupied Jerusalem.

In Cairo, the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs considered the Israeli minister's move a dangerous escalation and a clear violation of the provisions of international law and international humanitarian law. It stressed that these provocations aim to change the religious identity of the holy sites, warning of the catastrophic consequences of such policies on regional stability.

In turn, the State of Qatar condemned the incursion and considered it a blatant violation of Islamic rights, calling on the international community to bear its moral and legal responsibilities towards Jerusalem. Doha affirmed the necessity of firmly confronting repeated Israeli violations that affect the religious and historical status of the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque as a place exclusively for Muslims.

As for Jordan, it described the incursion as a flagrant breach and a violation of the sanctity of holy sites, warning against the occupation's attempts to impose temporal and spatial division in the mosque. Amman reiterated its condemnation of restricting freedom of worship and closing the mosque's doors to worshippers, affirming that the Hashemite custodianship will remain an impenetrable barrier against continuous Judaization attempts.

In the Palestinian context, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs demanded the immediate opening of Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre to worshippers, condemning the systematic policy of imposing a fait accompli by force. The ministry held the occupation government fully responsible for these violations, calling on international institutions to take urgent action to ensure freedom of worship and hold those responsible for these crimes accountable.

For its part, the Palestinian Ministry of Awqaf called for immediate action to defend Al-Aqsa Mosque, considering Ben-Gvir's incursion in the absence of worshippers to be of great danger. The ministry clarified that what the far-right government is doing is an assault on a purely religious site with an area of 144 dunams, and non-Muslims have no right to interfere in its affairs.

The Awqaf emphasized that the issue of the mosque's closure and daily siege must become an issue of international public opinion, given the fierce attack it is subjected to as the first of the two Qiblas. It appealed to Islamic and Arab institutions to fulfill their historical duties to prevent the entrenchment of a new reality aimed at obliterating the Arab and Islamic identity of occupied Jerusalem.

Regarding the factions, the Hamas movement said that Ben-Gvir's incursion reflects the occupation's insistence on imposing full sovereignty over Al-Aqsa through a systematic Judaization approach. Hamas leader Abdul Rahman Shadid affirmed that this action represents the peak of occupation arrogance, especially as it comes at a time when Palestinians are deprived of praying in their mosque.

Shadid added that the occupation seeks to empty Al-Aqsa Mosque and leave it an easy prey for settler incursions and their repeated attacks aimed at changing its features. He stressed that the Palestinian people will not stand idly by in the face of these attempts that target their holiest sites, calling for escalating steadfastness and resistance against these schemes.

Field reports indicate that occupation forces have tightened their military measures around the Old City, turning it into a military barracks to secure settler and official incursions. These developments come amid warnings that the continuation of these violations could lead to an explosion of the situation in all Palestinian territories.

Observers believe that the timing of the incursion with the prolonged closure of the mosque indicates a premeditated intention to establish new facts on the ground that go beyond previous international understandings. Palestinians affirm that Israel is intensifying its attacks to Judaize Jerusalem and obliterate its Arab identity, including both Islamic and Christian holy sites.

In conclusion, Al-Aqsa Mosque remains the primary focal point of the conflict, as popular and official activities continue to call for pilgrimage to it despite all obstacles and barriers. National forces demand the necessity of a firm international stance that goes beyond condemnation statements to actual measures that stop the Israeli encroachment in the holy city.

The extremist minister's storming of Al-Aqsa Mosque represents a continuation of the occupation's arrogance and its deliberate intention to undermine the sanctity of the mosque and empty it of worshippers.