OPINIONS
Sun 03 Nov 2024 9:29 am - Jerusalem Time
The Battle of negotiations
The negotiation battle between the colony on one side, and the two parties of the Palestinian-Lebanese resistance; Hamas and Hezbollah, mediated by Egypt, Qatar and the United States, is no less than the battle of clash, confrontation and fighting between the two parties of the bloody war and conflict. The attacks of the extremist, barbaric colony forces that clearly and prominently target civilians, whether in the Gaza Strip or across Lebanon, are no different from the attacks of the colony and its toxic deal offered by it and adopted by the Americans and attempts to pass it, with the aim of imposing political victory for the colony as a result of bombing, destruction, devastation and assassinations, so that the colony’s superior air force weapon is the tool for imposing political results on the two factions of the Palestinian and Lebanese resistance.
The negotiation battle from the perspective of the colony and the United States requires separating the war on Lebanon from the war on the Gaza Strip, with the aim of continuing the Israeli monopoly on the Strip and the Palestinian resistance and maintaining the return of the occupation forces to the Gaza Strip, and even the return of settlement to achieve the central title of the Israeli expansionist colonial project: occupying the entire map of Palestine, to be the desired “Jewish state” for them, according to the mentality, positions and concepts of the Israeli coalition of the Netanyahu government: 1- The extreme right-wing political parties, 2- With the extremist Jewish religious parties.
The proposals submitted by the colony government do not include the four headings: 1- A complete ceasefire, 2- The return of the displaced to their homes in the northern Gaza Strip, 3- The withdrawal of the occupation forces from the Gaza Strip, 4- The exchange of prisoners.
The four titles are the title of victory or defeat for both sides of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and therefore the Netanyahu government rejects any of the four titles and their contents, because they mean the current operational situation moving from a position of failure: 1- Failure to end the resistance despite the assassinations, comprehensive bombing, and destruction of homes, schools, and hospitals, 2- Failure to release the Israeli prisoners without an exchange, and even his failure to discover their locations despite his occupation of the entire Gaza Strip, 3- Failure to displace the Palestinians outside their country from the Strip to Sinai, 4- And the fourth failure will be the rejection of his proposals for a temporary and partial ceasefire.
What Netanyahu achieved in killing tens of thousands of Palestinian civilians, destroying cities, villages and neighborhoods, and carrying out assassinations using the superiority of the air force, American and European support, and the lack of ground defenses for the Palestinians and the Lebanese, but he was not able to impose surrender, defeat or submission on Hamas and Hezbollah, and he was not able to impose defeat on the Palestinians and end their steadfastness.
Hezbollah's declared position is:
1- Rejecting any amendment to the provisions of Resolution 1701, or to its implementation mechanisms.
2- The party still adheres to its position in support of the Palestinian people, and rejects the disengagement between the Lebanese front and the Palestine front in Gaza.
3- For him, the weapon of resistance is not negotiable, and that resistance is his obligatory title, and anything else contradicts his ideological reference and political thinking.
Hamas's position is based on:
1- A complete, comprehensive and permanent ceasefire.
2- Complete withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
3- The return of the displaced to their homes and residences.
4- Lifting the unjust siege on the Gaza Strip and its people.
5- Conducting a prisoner exchange.
6- Providing life requirements such as food, water, medicine and reconstruction.
Therefore, because the proposals submitted by the parties regarding a limited temporary truce, increasing the number of aid trucks, and a partial exchange of prisoners do not meet the minimum Palestinian demands, they are therefore rejected, without closing the door to negotiations, neither by Hezbollah nor by Hamas.
The battle will remain open, hot militarily and sharp politically, until the conditions and pressing factors are available, imposing victory or defeat, or the intervention of a neutral third party, which is not available yet.
Tags
MORE FROM OPINIONS
The American Veto: A True Partnership in the War of Extermination of Our People
op-ed "AlQuds" dot com
Israel exacerbates humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza
op-ed "AlQuds" dot com
The brutality of the occupation between international silence and American support
Sari Al Kidwa
Hochstein came up with a Lebanese version of the Oslo Accords!
Mohammed Alnobani
Syria: Bashar Al-Assad trapped in the heart of the Iran-Israel-Russia triangle
Translation for "Alquds" dot com
As U.S. ambassador, Rev. Mike Huckabee will push for ‘end times’ in Palestine
Mondoweiss
Turmoil at the ICC as fears rise over Israel and the U.S. interference
Mondoweiss
Israeli Newspaper: Why is Netanyahu prepared to accept a cease-fire with Hezbollah but not Hamas?
Haaretz - "Al-Quds" dot com
What's behind Netanyahu's miserable speech?
op-ed "AlQuds" dot com
Consequences of Hezbollah's approval of America's malicious card
Hamdy Farag
How do we thwart the next annexation?
Hani Al Masry
Is there a chance to survive?!
Jamal Zaqout
The Three Pillars of Trump’s Middle East Policy
Nadim Koteich
Trump’s unfinished business for ‘Greater Israel’
972+ Magazine
The world is a traitor as long as the war of killing children and women continues!
op-ed - Al-Quds dot com
Palestinian steadfastness
Hamada Faraana
Let's drop the illusions about Trump and prepare for the worst
Ahmed Rafiq Awad
In the face of the annexation plan
Ramzi Awda
Humanitarian disaster in northern Gaza Strip and a "settlement preparation" conference on its borders
Maher Al Sharif
US uses the new language of the devil
op-ed "AlQuds" dot com
Share your opinion
The Battle of negotiations