Assassination of Nasrallah is the opening of new gates of hell!

If the American-made K-83 bombs that Israel launched on the party’s headquarters in the southern suburbs are what killed His Eminence the Secretary-General of the party and his companions, then the killer is Iran before it is Israel!

His Eminence “Sayyed” and his companions, may God have mercy on them, were killed after the man carried on his shoulders, alone and without anyone else, the burdens of support and troublemaking, without Iranian or Syrian participation.

The Iranian adheres to the rules of engagement in order to obtain a prize, which is the lifting of international sanctions on the best terms, and the Syrian seeks to distance himself after the suffering of the civil war.

This is how the man loved and fell under the slogan: “Go, you and your party, and fight.” He carried the burden of war in front of his Shiite audience and in front of the anger of the Lebanese political force opposing him.

Tehran’s instructions to him were: “Be tough internally and discipline yourself on the front lines in the fighting.”

The instructions were: “Obstruct the election of the president until we negotiate its price with the West, and do not use your long-range missiles.”

The reality of the man's situation is that he wanted to save his reputation at home as one who obstructs the political settlement, and he wanted to prove his party's ability to wage jihad against Israel.

Netanyahu realized the dilemma the man was experiencing, so he decided to play the game skillfully and insisted on taking it to the last extent.

How did Netanyahu market his policy?

Netanyahu tried to market his policy to the Americans as follows:

1- This is not a battle or a round, but what is known in English as a game changer. That is why the code name for the recent assassination operation was: Operation "New Order".

2- Weakening the party is weakening the agents, and weakening the agents is weakening Iran. A weak Iran makes it easier and more malleable to pressure it.

According to the Israeli Likud concept, it is not in the interest of the Hebrew state now to reach any agreement on the Gaza or southern Lebanon fronts.

In the Likud concept, it is not possible to negotiate with Yahya Sinwar or Hassan Nasrallah until their military machine is destroyed and they are brought to the negotiating table, not for a peace agreement but for a surrender document.

There is a strong feeling in Washington that the current Netanyahu is not the Netanyahu he was in the first months after October 7

3 Strategic Goals for Netanyahu

In the concept of Netanyahu and his alliance, this is the golden time locally, regionally and internationally to achieve three strategic matters:

First: Ending any threat from the allied Iranian arms against the security and safety of the Hebrew state.

Second: Ending the strategic leaderships that Hamas, Hezbollah, the Popular Mobilization Forces and the Houthis rely on, which manage the command system of security and military operations against Israel's borders.

Third: Ending the strategic stockpile of missiles and drones held by these forces so that Israeli targets are not in danger and Israel is not forced to displace any settlers, whether in the Gaza Strip or on the northern front.

The Party

Bibi Netanyahu and his ruling coalition want to go down in modern history as the only ones who succeeded in bringing about this strategic change that relies on military force, then securing Israel with security buffer zones that enable the occupation authority to control security, energy, services, taxes and all aspects of life requirements in Gaza and ensure that the border with Lebanon is free of any threats.

“Bibi” achieves America’s interests

Informed sources here in Washington say that Israel wants to impose two things:

1- Securing the occupation in Gaza and the West Bank.

2- Securing the borders on the northern border.

These sources say that one of Netanyahu’s national security advisors confirmed to American officials during his recent visit to the American capital that striking Iran’s agents in the region has a great strategic benefit for the next American administration, regardless of whether it is Republican or Democratic, which is that weakening them will make Iran more flexible and less hardline in any future nuclear negotiations.

The philosophy of this type of thinking is based on the following idea: “Iran without strong and influential arms in the region will be more obedient to negotiations.”

Netanyahu realized the dilemma the man was experiencing and decided to play the game skillfully and insisted on taking it to the last extent

We are fighting Iran for you

The Israeli logic or narrative is based on the following vision:

We have proven to you, the Americans, and to the world our ability to strike them deeply or penetrate their leadership and carry out qualitative intelligence operations that will be taught in security academies. We have destroyed their strategic weapons. We have eliminated their masterminds and field commanders. We have dealt a fatal blow to their strategic stockpile of weapons. All of this is not aimed at weakening them alone, but primarily and inevitably to weaken Iran.

In every meeting between American and Israeli security officials, an Israeli official intervenes to correct and rectify the dialogue, repeating the phrase: “Remember, gentlemen. We are not fighting Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis, or the Popular Mobilization Forces. “We are fighting Iran directly, but through its agents who receive its funding and guidance”

Washington…and the new Netanyahu

There is a strong feeling in Washington that the current Netanyahu is not the Netanyahu he was in the first months after October 7.

The new Netanyahu has been feeling for seven weeks that he has an excess of power due to his successes in stalling to buy time and reach the threshold of a few weeks before the decisive battle for the American presidency because he realizes that the current Washington is under a president who has disabled his powers, and his vice president and candidate need the Jewish vote and Israeli support. And Trump is the strategic friend of the Hebrew state.

Netanyahu's surplus power is due to his success in qualitative operations (killing Hamas leaders. Assassinating Haniyeh in Tehran... to assassinating Fouad Shukr, Aqil, Al-Qubaysi, Surur and other leaders, all the way to the Secretary-General, and the pager and walkie-talkie bombings. The massacres in Khan Yunis, Rafah and the Lebanese border villages. And the large Lebanese exodus from the south to Tripoli, Sidon and Beirut to make Nasrallah's supporters turn against him).

This surplus power is supported by three things:

1- The support of all forces, even the opposition inside Israel, and their belief in the necessity of completing the operations on the northern front to return the residents of these areas.

2- The agreement between Netanyahu, Galant and the military level on the necessity of completing the operations.

Weakening the party is weakening the agents, and weakening the agents is weakening Iran. A weak Iran makes it easier and more malleable to pressure it.

3- The threat of ministers Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich and their faction in the ruling coalition to resign if Netanyahu concludes a ceasefire agreement.

Recent polls in Israel indicate that Netanyahu's popularity is on the rise, and that if parliamentary elections were held now, his coalition would win by a comfortable margin.

Read also: Power Deficit: The Victories of Rome and Hulagu No Longer Exist

I remind the honorable reader that I wrote here on this site four months ago, quoting an Arab official, about a warning he had given Washington about the necessity of advising Israel not to seek to kill His Eminence "the Sayyed", because that, according to the Arab official, would open the gates of hell in the region.

Killing Nasrallah is not the end of hell, but the beginning of a more blazing hell.

Source: Assas Media