Despite the truce, will the resistance allow the march of the flags to pass?

It is clear that one of the goals that Netanyahu wanted to achieve by launching the military operation and aggression against the Gaza Strip on the morning of Tuesday 9/5/2023 is not only the assassination of several military leaders of the Islamic Jihad, shackling and curbing the resistance, and working to restore the deterrent power of the entity state. It is eroding, and saving his government from disintegration and collapse, after the disputes that afflicted it, in light of the dispute between the "Bibian", the great Bibi Netanyahu and the little Bibi Ben Gvir, against the background of Ben Gvir boycotting the government sessions, due to what he considered a weak response to the missiles launched from The Gaza Strip is a response to the assassination of the mujahid Sheikh Khader Adnan by starvation in his cell inside the prison, and Netanyahu also wants to limit the development and escalation of the opposition force in the Israeli street, which for the eighteenth week was able to mobilize in several protest demonstrations half a million demonstrators, against his attempt to amend the Judicial legislation, weakening the authority of what is known as the Israeli Supreme Court, in a way that enables full control of the judicial system and liberating the government and the Knesset from judicial oversight.

Netanyahu and his government, after the assassinations that affected several Islamic Jihad military leaders, sought with America and through Arab countries that have influence on the Palestinian card, to establish a truce that would lead to “calm in exchange for calm” and impose deterrence equations and new rules of engagement, including breaking the relationship Between the Gaza Strip and Jerusalem, that unity of path and destiny that was created by the battle of the "Saif al-Quds" in May 2021, but it seems that what Netanyahu thought, dreamed and planned, in an attempt to pass his agendas and export his crises, did not succeed in shackling the resistance and making it accept the truce on his terms, especially The Islamic Jihad Movement, which launched a response entitled "Revenge for the Free", did not wage this battle alone, although it was the spearhead in it, as it followed with the rest of the resistance forces a variety of tactics in response to this aggression, tactics that were deeply etched into the consciousness and psyche of the Israeli public and its internal front. The delay in the response for thirty-six hours was part of the response, as well as the failure of Netanyahu’s lies and deceptions to create discord between the resistance forces, in particular the Jihad and Hamas movements, and the assertion that the joint leadership room is the one that decides on the response, its form, size, extent and start date, and in the field we saw How did the resistance forces excel tactically and strategically, through missile salvoes from multiple places and at different times, which enabled them to bypass the latest Israeli interceptor missile defense systems "Iron Dome" and "David's Sling", through the resistance's missiles possessing high-precision technologies, which was a surprise to the state of the entity Where the new dome was unable to intercept only 20% of the resistance's missiles, which reached the outskirts of Jerusalem and Bethlehem and caused great human and material losses.

The entity's state is based on security, economy and stability, and the resistance's missiles hit these three pillars, as we witnessed the great escape of settlers from the settlements around the Gaza Strip and the central regions, the paralysis of the commercial and economic movements, the closure of roads, the deployment of Iron Dome missile batteries throughout the entity's state, the opening of shelters, and the jogging And escaping to it, which affected the extremist Miri Regev, Minister of Communications.

The state of the entity wants the battle not to be prolonged, because its internal front is unable to bear staying in shelters and living under conditions of fear, anxiety and terror. The settlers of the entity feel that the military and political leadership of their state are lying to them, and it is unable to provide them with security and protection.

After the resistance’s missiles reached the outskirts of Jerusalem and demolished Tel Aviv, and he cut off contact with the Egyptians about the truce, he found himself in a deep dilemma. The policy of assassinations "leaders, cadres and citizens", and preventing the march of the flags from moving towards the old city and the Islamic quarter therein and handing over the body of the fighter Khader Adnan, and in return all these demands pour into the liquidation of the program of his partner in the government Ben Ghafir, by continuing the policy of assassinations and the march of the flags according to its path and the determination of sovereignty and control On Jerusalem, tightening the screws on the prisoners, withdrawing their achievements and gains, and stripping them of their rights, and in return expanding the circle of battle and aggression, by striking infrastructure, institutions, government headquarters, and civilian buildings, which may lead to targeting economic and vital targets in the entity’s state, such as power stations, gas platforms, trains, airports, ports, and others. Through more accurate missiles and the largest explosive power and the longest range available to the Hamas and Jihad movements.

The Minister of Staff of the Israeli army, Herzi Halevy, the Shin Bet official, Ronen Bar, and the Israeli opposition, called for an end to the operation, because, as they described it, it weakened the Islamic Jihad movement militarily and in leadership, through the liquidation of many of its military leaders, and the destruction of its military structure and missile stockpile, as well as there is no longer a bank of targets. Except for children, women, and civilian buildings, as well as the continuation and expansion of the aggression, which may lead to the unification of the arenas and the entity’s state to wage the battle on more than one front, and it experienced this in the ten-hour battle on 4/5/2023, when the resistance’s missiles entered from Lebanon, Syria and Gaza in favor of Preventing the settlers from continuing to storm Al-Aqsa and brutally attacking the stationed, seclusion and worshipers, which forced Netanyahu and his government to prevent settlers from continuing their storming of Al-Aqsa in the last ten days of Ramadan, and searched for a framed and restricted response accusing Hamas of being responsible for the rockets, so as not to get involved in a war On more than one front, he appeared deterred and maimed in front of the Jerusalem axis.

After this battle, I believe that the state of the entity that has entered the stage of no exit in light of its deep political, societal and structural crises, and the conflict raging within it ideologically and culturally over the entity’s identity, and the eruption of these crises through what is known as legislative and judicial amendments, and Netanyahu’s going to this aggression on the Gaza Strip and the assassination of many The military leaders, with the aim of restoring and restoring the deterrent force as one of the goals of the aggression and fortifying his government from collapse, all indications say that after reaching a truce with the Palestinian resistance under Egyptian auspices at ten o'clock last Saturday 13/5/2023, Netanyahu's reckoning will be coming, and he may overthrow his government and his political and personal future, and his fate will be imprisonment, and it seems that the dilemma in which he put himself is between the Jewish fascism that clings to the march of the flags in its planned path, and the resistance that settles itself, by insisting on stopping the march of the flags or changing its course, even if there is a truce, It considers that march, and according to its path on the eighteenth of this month, from the Bab al-Amoud area towards the Old City and its march and penetration into the Islamic Quarter, a transgression of all red lines and an encroachment on the Arabism and sanctity of the city, and seeking to change its identity, character, narrative, history and overall scene, and therefore this march may ignite the fuse of confrontation Again, perhaps the entity’s government will review itself and prevent it from proceeding according to the path that it agreed to, or it will insist on this path, which may ignite the fuse of confrontation again, because the resistance forces see Jerusalem and Al-Aqsa as the way to protect the Palestinian cause..