The Shattering of the Zionist Dream: Why 'Greater Israel' Will Not Be Realized

The discussion today about the impossibility of realizing the dream of 'Greater Israel' seems to be based on interconnected facts leading to a historical certainty, despite the heavy price the entity might impose before its retreat. This dream, which arose in the minds of extremist Zionists, collides with a wall of popular and geographical rejection that has not changed for decades.

Despite eighty years since the entity's establishment, its geographical borders remain mere lines on paper, incapable of actual expansion or psychological dominance over the Arab surroundings. The entity is besieged by an environment that rejects its existence, and official peace agreements have failed to break the barrier of popular animosity deeply rooted in the collective consciousness.

Experience in Egypt and Jordan has proven that paper normalization has not found its way into the hearts of the people; instead, the regimes have covered these agreements with political oppression. Arab peoples have proven their inherent resistance and will not accept the integration of the entity into the fabric of the region, no matter the international or regional pressures.

In the near vicinity, we find resistance in Lebanon continuing for half a century despite immense sacrifices, while Syrian popular unrest shows rejection of any truce. Even in the Maghreb countries, the slogan 'Liberation of Palestine' remains a universal demand reflecting a constant readiness for sacrifice for the central cause.

Despite its flaws, the Oslo Accords represented an indicator of the collapse of the expansionist dream, as the battle shifted from outside to the heart of the occupied territories. This shift enabled Palestinians to exploit every available gap to develop tools of resistance, leading to the pivotal moment on October 7th.

Events of October 7th clarified the picture for the entire world, distinguishing between the rightful victim and the brutal occupier. This moral clarity created a rift in the Zionist narrative that had dominated minds for long decades, and the world began to realize the truth of the conflict.

Today, we are witnessing a profound shift in global public opinion, as protests and new awareness have spread to the heart of major cities like New York. This escalating trajectory poses real obstacles to any project to implement 'Greater Israel,' whether through direct occupation or political dominance.

Western citizens, in Europe and America, are seriously questioning the utility of paying their taxes to support an entity that commits crimes and undermines global stability. This shock in Western consciousness represents an existential threat to the Zionist project, which historically relied on unconditional financial and military support.

Official and popular Spanish stances, and shifts in Hungary, open a historical path for the disappearance of fear of Zionist influence in the West. Western politicians will soon find themselves facing a difficult choice: either continue supporting the entity or lose the votes of their aware populations.

War against Iran clearly revealed that the entity is trying to drag the United States into battles that do not serve direct American interests. Americans have realized that they are paying heavy prices for the 'Epstein class' and Zionist lobbies that control decision-making in Washington.

The failure of American power to destroy Iran led to the collapse of reasons for fearing the 'armed giant' that no longer frightens anyone in the region. This breakdown in deterrence prestige will encourage regional countries to seek security and economic alliances away from the umbrella of declining American influence.

There is a nascent conviction forming in the Arab political mind that sheltering under the United States is no longer effective after its betrayal of its allies. Washington prioritized the entity's security over the interests of its traditional partners, creating a state of frustration and despair regarding the idea of American military protection.

The decline of Western protection for Arab regimes linked to the entity's existence will put these regimes in direct confrontation with the demands of their peoples. These regimes, which have transformed into auxiliary entities to protect the entity, will find themselves exposed to demands for freedoms, democracy, and national liberation.

In conclusion, the Arab world today stands on the brink of a major strategic transformation that may end in a popular explosion that shatters the illusions of Zionist expansion. The moment of truth is approaching, and peoples only need to arm themselves with patience and observe the collapse of the 'Greater Israel' project, which has effectively begun to fade.

The cost of Israel in the region and in the world is now being paid directly by Western citizens from their taxes and strength, and this exploding awareness represents a crushing blow to the entity's existential project.