Washington's anti-Palestinian policies

Despite US President Trump's blatant bias toward the Israeli colony, which he strongly supports and backs, and his and his extremist Zionist political team's clear rejection of Palestinian rights, we must pause and pay attention to the practical steps taken by the White House President, namely:

First: Netanyahu was forced to accept a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip before assuming his constitutional powers on January 20, 2025.

Second: Imposing the idea of a ceasefire, opening the door and negotiating table regarding Ukraine, and forcing it to accept the idea of reaching a ceasefire agreement with Russia.

Third: He played a pivotal role in reaching an agreement between Ahmed al-Sharaa's government and the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).

Fourth: Opening direct negotiations with Hamas, in contradiction with the policies of the colonial government and Netanyahu's policies.

Fifth: He practically and morally retreated from the issue of displacing Palestinians from the Gaza Strip, and publicly declared that no one would force them to leave.

He is a strong and extremist supporter of the colony, along with his political tools of ambassadors and ministers, the majority of whom are blatantly hostile to the Palestinian people, and therefore it is not expected that he will move from a state of support for the colony to support for the Palestinian people, or sympathize with their suffering in the Gaza Strip. However, despite the manifestations of racism and extremism devoted to the benefit of the colony, he can also be described as a practical, pragmatic person who prioritizes the interests of the United States, and seeks economic gains. His team is mostly from a commercial investment background, and their political backgrounds are low, and for this reason he rejected the option of war everywhere, and seeks practical settlements that end the option of wars as a solution to political issues.

Therefore, it must be dealt with, and the tools, means and methods that will make it responsive to Palestinian interests must be sought. First and foremost, there is a Palestinian people on Palestinian land, not a poor, helpless community, but a mighty, cohesive, steadfast and courageous people. It is the first and most important factor in the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which cannot be ignored, ignored, erased or displaced. This is no longer in the Palestinians’ calculations or options.

The second factor is Israeli extremism, which has provoked the world and continues to provoke it, especially the Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, the Emirates, and Qatar, which are deeply involved in the political situation and are friends of the United States. They can play a very important role in serving its national and regional interests, and there is understanding and coordination between them. This is in addition to the Islamic countries that stand united with Palestine.

The third factor is the deepening positive European and international stance toward Palestine. Additional momentum lies in the American and Israeli popular movements against the war, and in the agreement reached to end the war.

The factors of conflict are in favor of Palestine, with the exception of the Palestinian division, which provides a free service to the colony. Both the Fatah authority in Ramallah and the Hamas authority in Gaza bear responsibility for the failure of understanding and coordination between them, based on the monopoly that binds their political behavior together.

Here is the statement issued by the G7 industrialized nations: Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Britain, the United States, and the European Union High Representative, issued at their meeting on Friday, March 14, 2025. This is the beginning of the retreat from support for the two-state solution, and the beginning of the Hanjala dance. The Palestinian division is the reason for the beginning of the retreat from the two-state solution.

.....

The factors of conflict are in favor of Palestine, with the exception of the Palestinian division, which provides a free service to the colony. Both the Fatah authority in Ramallah and the Hamas authority in Gaza bear responsibility for the failure of understanding and coordination between them, based on the monopoly that binds their political behavior together.